Evading RF Signal Detection on the Modern Battlefield
In today’s conflicts, electronic warfare has become as critical as traditional combat. In Ukraine, Russian forces have employed advanced RF signal detection tools to intercept and jam communications, prompting military planners to reconsider how forces stay connected under contested conditions (Wired, 2024). U.S. military training has increasingly focused on reducing electromagnetic signatures, reinforcing the growing importance of communication systems that are not only secure but also difficult to detect (Business Insider, 2024).
For personnel operating in the field, conventional wired communication systems introduce vulnerabilities—not only through their physical complexity but through the RF signals they emit. These emissions can be detected by adversaries equipped with spectrum-sensing technologies that scan for broad-spectrum signals, making many traditional systems susceptible to both interference and exposure.
A New Approach
In response to this evolving threat environment, companies are exploring new approaches to field communication. One such approach is Wi-R™, a technology developed by IXANA that uses patented electro-quasistatic (EQS) human body communication.
Rather than relying on radio frequency transmissions, EQS uses the user’s body as the medium for data transmission, operating at ultra-low frequencies that fall below the range typically monitored by military sensing systems. OTTO Engineering serves as IXANA’s exclusive integration partner for tactical markets, bringing the technology to applications where RF discretion is paramount.
Built for the Modern Battlefield
“EQS signals operate at very low frequencies, far below the ranges used by most military spectrum sensing systems,” IXANA notes, suggesting that such signals are less likely to be intercepted or disrupted in contested environments.
While traditional solutions—whether through exposed cabling or RF-based wireless transmissions—can introduce operational and detection risks, EQS aims to provide a more discreet alternative. For military personnel, this could mean greater mobility and reduced exposure without sacrificing communication capabilities.
U.S. Army training exercises have recently emphasized minimizing electromagnetic signatures in the field—part of a broader effort to prepare for RF-contested environments (Business Insider, 2024). While Wi-R was not part of those exercises, its design speaks directly to the same operational goals: maintaining communications while reducing the risk of detection.
Advancing With Intent
As Andy Greenberg noted in Wired, “the ability to move and communicate without being detected is becoming as important as firepower itself." In a domain where control over the electromagnetic spectrum can influence the outcome of an engagement, the exploration of alternative technologies—such as those developed by IXANA and integrated by OTTO—represents a growing effort to align communications with the realities of modern warfare.
Add your comment